There was a discussion about finding a short correction for the "widespread belief" that Unicode is 16-bit character set containing 65536 characters. Now I have noticed this statement by Roman Czyborra (taken from the last paragraph of http://czyborra.com/charsets/iso646.html), and I found that it is one of the most compact, precise, and understandable explanations that I have seen so far: "Unicode [...] encodes all the world's characters in a 16bit space and a 20bit extension zone for everything that did not fit into the 16bit space." _ Marco
- RE: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate ... Marco Cimarosti
- Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surro... Antoine Leca
- RE: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surro... Peter_Constable
- RE: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surro... Cathy Wissink
- RE: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surro... Marco Cimarosti
- Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surro... Joel Rees
- Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surro... Tom Lord
- Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surro... Marco Cimarosti
- Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surro... Peter_Constable
- Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surro... Peter_Constable
- Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surro... Peter_Constable
- RE: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surro... Carl W. Brown
- Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surro... Tom Lord
- Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surro... Tex Texin
- Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surro... Peter_Constable
- Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surro... Joel Rees
- Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surro... Joel Rees
- Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surro... Peter_Constable

