Mark Davis wrote: >> A _code_point_ is an integer value which is assigned to an abstract >> character. Each character receives a unique code point. > > > inaccurate. Multiple *abstract characters* can have a single code point; > multiple code points can correspond to a single *abstract character*. TUS 3.0 is vague on this, but I suppose what is meant is that if two single characters are canonically equivalent, they constitute only one abstract character. Does U+0041 U+0300 represent one abstract character (the same as the abstract character represented by U+00C0) or two consecutive abstract characters? If the former, does U+0051 U+0300 also represent an abstract character? -- There is / one art || John Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> no more / no less || http://www.reutershealth.com to do / all things || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan with art- / lessness \\ -- Piet Hein
- An Aburdly Brief Introduction to Unicode (was Re: Percept... Tom Lord
- Re: An Aburdly Brief Introduction to Unicode (was Re... Peter_Constable
- Re: An Aburdly Brief Introduction to Unicode (was Re... Markus Scherer
- Re: An Aburdly Brief Introduction to Unicode (was Re... Paul Keinanen
- Re: An Aburdly Brief Introduction to Unicode (was Re... Mark Davis
- Re: An Aburdly Brief Introduction to Unicode (was Re... John Cowan
- Re: An Aburdly Brief Introduction to Unicode (was Re... Mark Davis
- Re: An Aburdly Brief Introduction to Unicode (was Re... Kenneth Whistler
- Re: An Aburdly Brief Introduction to Unicode (was Re... Peter_Constable
- Re: An Aburdly Brief Introduction to Unicode (was Re... Peter_Constable
- Re: An Aburdly Brief Introduction to Unicode (was Re... Peter_Constable
- Re: An Aburdly Brief Introduction to Unicode (was Re... Kenneth Whistler
- Re: An Aburdly Brief Introduction to Unicode (was Re... Peter_Constable
- Re: An Aburdly Brief Introduction to Unicode (was Re... Mark Davis
- Re: An Aburdly Brief Introduction to Unicode (was Re... Peter_Constable
- Re: An Aburdly Brief Introduction to Unicode (was Re... Peter_Constable

