Peter said: > As I indicated above, I think that there is a non-vacuous notion that > merits a specific term for the purposes of discussion, and that that notion > is the one I have been assuming up to now. And that is (abstract character)1, as I clarified earlier. I agree with you, Peter, that Mark may have overstated the case for the vacuity of the notion that SC2 defined for "character". It is precisely to cover those "things" that get encoded in character encoding standards, whether they be elements of text or of information control (hence ASCII printable characters plus ASCII control characters, at its simplest). But we need a separate term for (abstract[able] character)2, which is what Mark was trying to point to -- one of those "things" that you "recognize one when you see one" as an appropriate element of a writing system for encoding in the UCS and which exist prior to any determination of actual encodings of "that which has been encoded". --Ken
- Re: An Aburdly Brief Introduction to Unicode (was Re: Per... Mark Davis
- Re: An Aburdly Brief Introduction to Unicode (was Re: Per... Kenneth Whistler
- Re: An Aburdly Brief Introduction to Unicode (was Re: Per... Peter_Constable
- Re: An Aburdly Brief Introduction to Unicode (was Re: Per... Peter_Constable
- Re: An Aburdly Brief Introduction to Unicode (was Re: Per... Peter_Constable
- Re: An Aburdly Brief Introduction to Unicode (was Re: Per... Kenneth Whistler
- Re: An Aburdly Brief Introduction to Unicode (was Re: Per... Peter_Constable
- Re: An Aburdly Brief Introduction to Unicode (was Re: Per... Mark Davis
- Re: An Aburdly Brief Introduction to Unicode (was Re: Per... Peter_Constable
- Re: An Aburdly Brief Introduction to Unicode (was Re: Per... Peter_Constable
- Re: An Aburdly Brief Introduction to Unicode (was Re: Per... Kenneth Whistler
- Re: An Aburdly Brief Introduction to Unicode (was Re: Per... Mark Davis
- Re: An Aburdly Brief Introduction to Unicode (was Re: Per... Peter_Constable

