I thought Plan 9 isn't really a UNIX? > My point is that UTF-8 is not really up to the task it was designed for, > i.e. transparent usability with hosts that are ignorant of it. In fact it > was designed only for UNIX (Plan 9), which is why "/" is sacrosanct, and why > it contains no NULs (because of C).
- UTF-8, C1 controls, and UNIX Frank da Cruz
- Re: UTF-8, C1 controls, and UNIX Frank da Cruz
- Re: UTF-8, C1 controls, and UNIX Keld J�rn Simonsen
- Re: UTF-8, C1 controls, and UNIX DougEwell2
- Re: UTF-8, C1 controls, and UNIX J%ORG KNAPPEN
- Re: UTF-8, C1 controls, and UNIX DougEwell2
- Re: UTF-8, C1 controls, and UNIX Frank da Cruz
- Re: UTF-8, C1 controls, and UNIX Antoine Leca
- Re: UTF-8, C1 controls, and UNIX P. T. Rourke
- Re: UTF-8, C1 controls, and UNIX Frank da Cruz
- Re: UTF-8, C1 controls, and UNIX Frank da Cruz
- Re: UTF-8, C1 controls, and UNIX Kenneth Whistler
- Re: UTF-8, C1 controls, and UNIX David Starner
- Re: UTF-8, C1 controls, and UNIX John Cowan
- Re: UTF-8, C1 controls, and UNIX Frank da Cruz
- RE: UTF-8, C1 controls, and UNIX Ayers, Mike
- Re: UTF-8, C1 controls, and UNIX Paul Keinanen
- RE: UTF-8, C1 controls, and UNIX Marco Cimarosti
- RE: UTF-8, C1 controls, and UNIX Frank da Cruz

