> > > A joint glossary
> > > would be useful.
> >
> > An editor who volunteers to produce the joint glossary would also be
> > useful.
>
> I have actually an action item to do a paper in SC2 on the use of
terminology.

And I'm toying with the idea of at least putting Unicode definitions side by
side with those in ISO/IEC 10646, though I haven't yet convinced myself that
that would get us very far.

Mike.

Reply via email to