RE: UTF8 vs. Unicode (UTF16) in code

[Peter_Constable]

On 03/08/2001 07:40:25 PM "Ayers, Mike" wrote:

>    If you really want to finish the job, there's always UTF-32, which
>should do rather nicely until we meet the space aliens aith the
>4,293,853,186 character alphabet!

Um... no. The 1,113,023 character alphabet (one more than the encodable
scalar values in the codespace supported by UTF-8 / 16 / 32).



- Peter


---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peter Constable

Non-Roman Script Initiative, SIL International
7500 W. Camp Wisdom Rd., Dallas, TX 75236, USA
Tel: +1 972 708 7485
E-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>