> -----Original Message----- > From: Michael (michka) Kaplan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, March 09, 2001 12:26 PM > To: Unicode List > Subject: Re: Unicode market acceptance > > > One of the most compelling arguments for those managers is > the financial > one... ease of support for multiple languages. If you look at > the cost of > the multiple binary releases of a product like Win95 and > compare it to the > single EXE model, the issue is clear... I sure would like to look at a comparison of these costs. Are they available anywhere? Francois
- Unicode market acceptance Tex Texin
- Re: Unicode market acceptance Pierpaolo BERNARDI
- Re: Unicode market acceptance Tex Texin
- RE: Unicode market acceptance Marco Cimarosti
- Re: Unicode market acceptance Tex Texin
- Re: Unicode market acceptance Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
- Re: Unicode market acceptance Richard, Francois M
- Re: Unicode market acceptance Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
- Re: Unicode market acceptance Richard Cook
- Re: Unicode market acceptance Tex Texin
- RE: Unicode market acceptance Peter_Constable
- Re: Unicode market acceptance Tex Texin
- RE: Unicode market acceptance Suzanne M. Topping
- Re: Unicode market acceptance Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
- RE: Unicode market acceptance Suzanne M. Topping
- RE: Unicode market acceptance Hart, Edwin F.
- RE: Unicode market acceptance Edward Cherlin

