In a message dated 2001-03-15 11:57:11 Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > A broad summary of the CJK issues that I gathered: ... > --Limited number of code points If anyone is complaining that the number of code points in Unicode is too limited (whether for CJK reasons or otherwise) it is because of that silly myth that keeps going around that Unicode is a 16-bit character encoding that has room for 2^16 characters. As I mentioned not long ago, even the latest on-line documentation shipped with Windows 2000 perpetuates this story, and I have to believe it is misleading a LOT of people. -Doug Ewell Fullerton, California
- RE: Unicode complaints Roozbeh Pournader
- RE: Unicode complaints Peter_Constable
- Re: Unicode complaints Markus Scherer
- Re: Unicode complaints Roozbeh Pournader
- Re: Unicode complaints Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
- Re: Unicode complaints Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
- RE: Unicode complaints Roozbeh Pournader
- Re: Unicode complaints Roozbeh Pournader
- Re: Unicode complaints Jonathan Coxhead
- Re: Unicode complaints Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
- Re: Unicode complaints DougEwell2
- Re: Unicode complaints Mark Davis
- Re: Unicode complaints Rick McGowan
- RE: Unicode complaints Marco Cimarosti
- Re: Unicode complaints Roozbeh Pournader
- Re: Unicode complaints Mark Davis
- RE: Unicode complaints Peter_Constable

