Am 2001-03-22 um 14:31 h MEZ hat Tomas McGuinness geschrieben: > I am currently developing a product that will support UCS-2 For a new project, it would be better to support UTF-16, rather than UCS-2, from the very beginning. There are already characters accepted for standardization that can not be encoded in UCS-2. Cf. - <http://www.unicode.org/unicode/faq/>, - <http://www.unicode.org/unicode/faq/utf_bom.html#5>, - <http://www.unicode.org/unicode/alloc/Pipeline.html#Characters and Scripts Accepted for Unicode>. Best wishes, Otto Stolz
- [unicode] Re: UCS-2 Files Marco Cimarosti
- [unicode] Re: UCS-2 Files Gaute B Strokkenes
- [unicode] Re: UCS-2 Files Jeff Guevin
- [unicode] Re: UCS-2 Files Roozbeh Pournader
- [unicode] Re: UCS-2 Files jgo
- [unicode] Re: UCS-2 Files mbrown
- [unicode] Re: UCS-2 Files Frank da Cruz
- [unicode] Re: bytes & bits Jeff Guevin
- [unicode] Re: UCS-2 Files Mike Brown
- [unicode] Re: UCS-2 Files Peter_Constable
- [unicode] Re: UCS-2 Files Otto Stolz
- [unicode] Re: UCS-2 Files Carl W. Brown
- [unicode] Re: UCS-2 Files Carl W. Brown
- [unicode] Re: UCS-2 Files J M Sykes
- [unicode] Re: UCS-2 Files Carl W. Brown
- [unicode] Re: UCS-2 Files Pierpaolo BERNARDI