Sarasvati,
> So I examined the bounced message... Can you guess
> where the banned text occurred? In a "Received" header:
>
> > Received: from ossex1.ossinc.net (corp.webb.net [207.182.160.15])
>
> I suppose there is a lesson in this. Would anyone
> care to supply a piquant aphorism?
I defer to juuichiketajin for piquant aphorism provision.
But an examination of the recent mail that you have delivered to me
also turns up the following highly offensive entries:
==> CMSC, National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, Middlesex, UK. TW11 0LW
[[ doubly offensive, with its connotation of physicality and
experimentation in conjunction with sex ]]
==> Rewrite the sentence as follows: "For yesexpr, this specifies that
[[ which suggests to me that all of POSEX should also be banned for
subliminal raunchiness that encourages us to say yes to sex ]]
==> 3s3uTitrguzugFtY4sexsdxxyeXSAE/XKDqd1WFwqGppFs4JWoJJrMWm4lJcptUrjhGy5pzIdhL0
[[ truly demonic instance, and even worse when pronounced backwards ]]
and:
==> 5E/KKcYHmpjuv0ysxFUcKt2HK5xe2LBQWKyKBa70SkWFSxNnwBRt60Yf+9rJo6PDQDeMHjxxcqT3
'nough said.
-- Disgruntled in Emeryville
