Harald Tveit Alvestrand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >Yes, I was referring to (sequences of) Unicode characters which
> >represent glyphs looking very similar.
>
> for the least disgusting treatment of this subject in the IETF, refer to
> draft-ietf-idn-nameprep-03.txt.
Looks interesting, thanks.
> we would love to see UNICODE and/or ISO give stable and useful
> references to get us out of trouble in this space. (note: stable is
> VERY important....people don't love updates that require changing
> software in every PC and PDA in the world....)
Usually, you can design for change, even in such areas. ;-)
