Re: Tags and the Private Use Area

[David Starner]

On Sun, Apr 29, 2001 at 03:14:23AM -0500, David Starner wrote:
> Why? For HTTP, all it would take is a line like 
> "Content-Unicode-PUA: Klingon; ref=http://www.kli.org/klingon.xml";
> where http://www.kli.org/klingon.xml is the definition.
> 
> Considering the amount of stuff a web 0 has to support, I don't
                                     ^^^^ browser
> see why this would be a 0 cost for anyone. Nothing says lynx
                          ^^^ huge
> or Opera has to support it, but the heavyweight browser (IE, Mozilla)
> wouldn't have any reason not to. 
> 
> > Therefore, communities that share a well 
> > defined set of characters are better off if they can be standardized.
> 
> Well, duh. From the 0 to this thread, I don't think there's
                     ^^^ responses

[Misspelled words were replaced with 0's, through a local mishap. I 
guess they weren't misspelled any more . . .]

-- 
David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Pointless website: http://dvdeug.dhis.org
"I don't care if Bill personally has my name and reads my email and 
laughs at me. In fact, I'd be rather honored." - Joseph_Greg