On Mon, 7 May 2001 11:35:40 EDT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

#In a message dated 2001-05-07 6:55:01 Pacific Daylight Time, 
#[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
#
#>  Current programming languages (C++ and others) have violated
#>  what I consider good language design by overloading the same
#>  glyphs for totally different uses.  
#>  The most obvious is <> for brackets and operators! 
#
#C++ was developed in the early 1980s, and was based on C, which in turn was 
#developed around 1970.  At this time, it had only been a few years since 
#7-bit ASCII had been invented, let alone standardized.  C was one of the 
#first languages to take full, or nearly full, advantage of 7-bit ASCII.
#
#In subsequent years, continued limitations in ASCII conformance forced C to 
#add the trigraph hack, in which sequences beginning with "??" replaced some 
#of the less frequently available ASCII characters.  For example, "??<" and 
#"??>" stood for the curly brackets { and }, and "??'" stood for ^.  Trigraphs 
#are still supported in the most modern C and C++ compilers, regardless of the 
#platform's character set support, and you have to backslash-escape one of the 
#question marks in a literal string that contains "??" if you don't want any 
#surprises.
#
Yes, I know why it is the mess it is.

#Any programming language that wants to avail itself of the rich set of 
#punctuation, brackets, and other symbols found in Unicode must have at least 
#the following features:
#
#1.  Commonly used symbols *must* be directly available on virtually all 
#Latin-script keyboards, not just by typing convoluted dead-key or 
#Alt-sequences.
#
We need more shift and shift lock keys so that more than ASCII
can be done from a keyboard.  Typing /U#### is also not acceptable.
My program editor already uses Ctrl-Shift, Alt-Shift and Ctrl-Alt to get
more key combinations on all the other keys but using two shift keys is awkward for
anything used frequently.
We need Unicode keyboards.

#2.  Symbols must be easy to distinguish from each other, not just in a 
#professionally designed font but in ordinary handwriting, to prevent 
#confusion.

Anything is better than looking at a < and asking,
Is this a less than or is this an open template bracket.


#
#-Doug Ewell
# Fullerton, California
#



Reply via email to