On 04/18/2001 09:49:40 AM John Jenkins wrote: >At the same time, none of the people involved in defining TrueType -- >Adobe, Apple, and Microsoft -- believe that it is really a good idea to >have a single font covering all of Unicode. Microsoft provides one >because there has been a strong push from people demanding it, but it >still isn't a good idea. Clarification: MS provides one that covers only Unicode 2.1; it does not cover characters added in 3.0 or later. - Peter --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Peter Constable Non-Roman Script Initiative, SIL International 7500 W. Camp Wisdom Rd., Dallas, TX 75236, USA Tel: +1 972 708 7485 E-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- Re: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of uni... Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
- Re: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of uni... Jungshik Shin
- Re: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits o... Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
- RE: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of uni... Marco Cimarosti
- OT Porting to older OSes was RE: Latin w/ d... Carl W. Brown
- Re: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of uni... William Overington
- Re: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of uni... John Jenkins
- Re: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of uni... てんどうりゅうじ
- Re: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits o... Michael (michka) Kaplan
- Re: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of uni... Peter_Constable
- Re: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of uni... てんどうりゅうじ
- Re: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits o... Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
- RE: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of uni... Marco Cimarosti
- RE: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of uni... Marco Cimarosti
- RE: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of uni... Peter_Constable
- RE: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of uni... Ayers, Mike

