Why are so few double combining diacritics included in Unicode? Also, why these particular ones? (U+0360 COMBINING DOUBLE TILDE, U+0361 COMBINING DOUBLE INVERTED BREVE, U+0362 COMBINING DOUBLE RIGHTWARDS ARROW BELOW) Is the general consensus that this kind of symbols belong more properly to rich text with complex layout control (so as to accomodate symbols that apply to larger groups of characters)? Is there the possibility that more of them could be encoded in the future? This message was prompted by a book that uses an arc below pairs of letters, as well as its spacing variant (which is encoded, U+203F UNDERTIE). Well, both of them are underties (Greek hyphens) but they're used in different ways... -- Alejandros Diamandidis * [EMAIL PROTECTED]
