Antoine Leca wrote: > Jianping Yang wrote: > > > > As a matter of fact, the surrogate or supplementary character was not defined > > in the past, > > How long is "the past"? I remember reading about these surrogates the first > time I put my hands on a draft copy of ISO 10646. It was nearly six years ago. > Surrogate range was defined there but no character was defined in that range until recently. > Or do you mean that it was (or worse, still is) impossible to have PUA > characters is some DB products... No, you cannot imply that... > > > so we could live without Premise B in the past. But now the > > supplementary character is defined and will soon be supported, > > "Soon to be supported" will be kind for Microsoft+James Kass to hear. > Nothing will prevent you from storing surrogates into DB products. But here you have to wait for the OS to provide the IM and font for them. Regards, Jianping. > > Antoine
begin:vcard n:Yang;Jianping tel;fax:650-506-7225 tel;work:650-506-4865 x-mozilla-html:FALSE org:Server Gobalization Technology;Server Technology version:2.1 email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED] title:Senior Development Manager adr;quoted-printable:;;500 Oracle Packway=0D=0AM/S 659407;Redwood Shores;CA;94065; fn:Jianping Yang end:vcard
