Kenneth Whistler wrote: > Plane 14 PUA usage description tags? Naaah, nobody would suggest such > a bizarre thing, would they? The three words "PUA usage description" are redundant, methinks. Removing them leaves a more concise and dramatic example of a weird proposal. _ Marco
- Re: UTF-8S (was: Re: ISO vs Unicode UTF-8) DougEwell2
- Re: UTF-8S (was: Re: ISO vs Unicode UTF-8) DougEwell2
- Re: UTF-8S (was: Re: ISO vs Unicode UTF-8) DougEwell2
- Re: UTF-8S (was: Re: ISO vs Unicode UTF-8) Peter_Constable
- Re: UTF-8S (was: Re: ISO vs Unicode UTF-8) Kenneth Whistler
- RE: UTF-8S (was: Re: ISO vs Unicode UTF-8) Marco Cimarosti
- RE: UTF-8S (was: Re: ISO vs Unicode UTF-8) Bill Kurmey
- Silliness (was RE: UTF-8S (was: Re: ISO... Edward Cherlin
- RE: UTF-8S (was: Re: ISO vs Unicode UTF-8) Peter_Constable
- Re: UTF-8S (was: Re: ISO vs Unicode UTF-8) DougEwell2
- Re: UTF-8S (was: Re: ISO vs Unicode UTF-8) Peter_Constable
- Re: UTF-8S (was: Re: ISO vs Unicode UTF... Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
- Re: UTF-8S (was: Re: ISO vs Unicode UTF-8) Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
- Re: UTF-8S (was: Re: ISO vs Unicode UTF... Mark Davis
- RE: UTF-8S (was: Re: ISO vs Unicode UTF-8) Marco Cimarosti
- Re: UTF-8S (was: Re: ISO vs Unicode UTF... Michael \(michka\) Kaplan