On 05/06/2001 13:03:03 Marco Cimarosti wrote:
[...]
> But how should this 6-byte sequence be interpreted by a standard UTF-8
> decoder? Does it become one or two code points?
That depends on where the decoder is. If it's inside an XML
parser, then it becomes neither of the above, but rather a
fatal error.
Misha
> _ Marco
>
>
>
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Visit our Internet site at http://www.reuters.com
Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual
sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be
the views of Reuters Ltd.
- Re: UTF-8S (was: Re: ISO vs Unicode UTF-8) Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
- RE: UTF-8S (was: Re: ISO vs Unicode UTF-8) Carl W. Brown
- Re: UTF-8S (was: Re: ISO vs Unicode UTF-8) Peter_Constable
- Re: UTF-8S (was: Re: ISO vs Unicode UTF-8) Mark Davis
- Re: UTF-8S (was: Re: ISO vs Unicode UTF-8) Peter_Constable
- Re: UTF-8S (was: Re: ISO vs Unicode UTF-8) Mark Davis
- RE: UTF-8S (was: Re: ISO vs Unicode UTF-8) Marco Cimarosti
- Re: UTF-8S (was: Re: ISO vs Unicode UTF-8) Mark Davis
- RE: UTF-8S (was: Re: ISO vs Unicode UTF-8) Marco Cimarosti
- RE: UTF-8S (was: Re: ISO vs Unicode UTF-8) Carl W. Brown
- Re: UTF-8S (was: Re: ISO vs Unicode UTF-8) Misha . Wolf
- Re: UTF-8S (was: Re: ISO vs Unicode UTF-8) Mark Davis
- Re: UTF-8S (was: Re: ISO vs Unicode UTF-8) Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
- Re: UTF-8S (was: Re: ISO vs Unicode UTF-8) Peter_Constable
- Re: UTF-8S (was: Re: ISO vs Unicode UTF-8) Markus Scherer
- RE: UTF-8S (was: Re: ISO vs Unicode UTF-8) Carl W. Brown
- Re: UTF-8S (was: Re: ISO vs Unicode UTF-8) Peter_Constable
- Re: UTF-8S (was: Re: ISO vs Unicode UTF-8) Peter_Constable
- Re: UTF-8S (was: Re: ISO vs Unicode UTF-8) Mark Davis
- Re: UTF-8S (was: Re: ISO vs Unicode UTF-8) Peter_Constable
- Re: UTF-8S (was: Re: ISO vs Unicode UTF-8) DougEwell2

