Toby, I think you forgot to comment on these objections that have also
been coming up from time to time:
* Introduction of UTF-8S would merely add to the myriad forms people would
already have to support, and it is insufficiently distinuguishable from
UTF-8.
* encoding ambiguities in the surrogate pairs vs 32-bit.
* implies a subsequent request for UTF-32S (mentioned in the original
proposal), thus two more forms are needed; but even that solution doesn't
gain consistency, it just gains two new forms.
Rick
- Re: UTF-8 syntax Jianping Yang
- RE: UTF-8 syntax Ayers, Mike
- Re: UTF-8 syntax Jianping Yang
- Re: UTF-8 syntax Peter_Constable
- Re: UTF-8 syntax Kenneth Whistler
- Re: UTF-8 syntax Lars Marius Garshol
- RE: UTF-8 syntax Peter_Constable
- Re: UTF-8 syntax Peter_Constable
- Re: UTF-8 Syntax toby_phipps
- RE: UTF-8 Syntax Carl W. Brown
- RE: UTF-8 syntax Rick McGowan
- RE: UTF-8 syntax Ayers, Mike
- Re: UTF-8 syntax Kenneth Whistler
- Re: UTF-8 syntax Jianping Yang
- Re: UTF-8 syntax Peter_Constable
- Re: UTF-8 syntax Kenneth Whistler
- Re: UTF-8 syntax Lars Marius Garshol
- RE: UTF-8 Syntax toby_phipps
- Re: UTF-8 Syntax Antoine Leca
- RE: UTF-8 Syntax Carl W. Brown
- RE: UTF-8 Syntax Marco Cimarosti

