At 13:14 -0500 2001-06-11, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >I'm not in a position to argue for or against these kinds of things in >plain text for Italian, French, etc. where the orthographies clearly do not >include superscripts as separate graphemes but rather these are notational >devices that supplement the orthography. Italics, bold and underlining are >also used to mean certain things, but clearly don't belong encoded as >character data. For things like 1e, I'm not sure where to draw the line. Lots of people with names like McGowan like to have the "c", ostensibly an abbreviation for "ac" superscripted and underlined. ;-) -- Michael Everson
- Re: Missing characters for Italian Peter_Constable
- RE: Missing characters for Italian Peter_Constable
- RE: Missing characters for Italian Marco Cimarosti
- RE: Missing characters for Italian Marco Cimarosti
- RE: Missing characters for Italian Marco Cimarosti
- RE: Missing characters for Italian Marco Cimarosti
- RE: Missing characters for Italian Kenneth Whistler
- RE: Missing characters for Italian Marco Cimarosti
- Re: Missing characters for Italian Antoine Leca
- Re: Missing characters for Italian Peter_Constable
- RE: Missing characters for Italian Michael Everson
- RE: Missing characters for Italian Yves Arrouye
- RE: Missing characters for Italian Peter_Constable
- Re: Missing characters for Italian Rick McGowan
- Re: Missing characters for Italian Michael Everson
- RE: Missing characters for Italian Marco Cimarosti
- RE: Missing characters for Italian Marco Cimarosti
- RE: Missing characters for Italian Peter_Constable

