I guess that this message by Markus Kuhn has been bounced as Markus is not
subscribed on the Unicode list.
-----Original Message-----
From: Markus Kuhn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 11.56
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: UTF-8S ???
What is this UTF-8S please? The term showed up on
[EMAIL PROTECTED] in
http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-utf8/2001-06/msg00037.html
without any link to a proposal document. Google and Altavista don't know
the term either. The [EMAIL PROTECTED] archive on
ftp://ftp.unicode.org/Public/MailArchive/
is utterly useless, because it provides only compressed batches of
ancient submissions, not one URL per posting in real-time as one would
hope from any quality mailing list archive such as e.g.
http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-utf8/
Please do not forget to *always* include the original document URL or
similar introductory information to cross-posts to other lists! Cut &
paste of URLs really isn't that difficult, so make a habit of it,
please!
So is this UTF-8S something useful, or just yet another
political-correctness exercise like UTF-32 was?
Markus
(not subscribed to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
--
Markus G. Kuhn, Computer Laboratory, University of Cambridge, UK
Email: mkuhn at acm.org, WWW: <http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/>
-
Linux-UTF8: i18n of Linux on all levels
Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-utf8/
