Re: Playing with Unicode (was: Re: UTF-17)

[Edward Cherlin]

At 12:29 PM 6/23/2001, Michael (michka) Kaplan wrote:
>From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
...
> > To keep well-meaning people from misinterpreting humorous UTF proposals as
> > serious, while still allowing the levity to flow freely, I hereby propose
> > that UTFs proposed in a non-serious light be indicated in lower-case
>letters
> > (e.g. utf-64, utf-17) while the serious UTFs and proposals should remain
>in
> > upper-case (e.g. UTF-8, UTF-16).
>
>A proposal needs a definition, though:
>
>     UTF would mean "Unicode Transformation Format"
>     utf would mean "Unicode Terrible Farce"

untenable total figment?