Mon, 25 Jun 2001 07:24:28 -0700, Mark Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> pisze:
> In most people's experience, it is best to leave the low level interfaces
> with indices in terms of code units, then supply some utility routines that
> tell you information about code points.
It's yet better to work on characters instead of code units internally,
i.e. use UTF-whatever only for interaction with external world.
Unfortunately some languages did a mistake of using only 16 bits per
character and it's not easy in them.
--
__("< Marcin Kowalczyk * [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://qrczak.ids.net.pl/
\__/
^^ SYGNATURA ZASTĘPCZA
QRCZAK
- Re: How does Python Unicode treat surrogates? Gaute B Strokkenes
- Re: How does Python Unicode treat surrogate... Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: How does Python Unicode treat surrogate... Mark Davis
- Re: [I18n-sig] Re: How does Python Unic... Mark Davis
- Re: How does Python Unicode treat surrogate... Rick McGowan
- Re: How does Python Unicode treat surrogate... J M Sykes
- Re: How does Python Unicode treat surro... Mark Davis
- Re: How does Python Unicode treat surrogate... Rick McGowan
- Re: How does Python Unicode treat surrogate... Gaute B Strokkenes
- Re: How does Python Unicode treat surrogate... DougEwell2

