>If you still find the definitions and discussion in the technical report
>to be unclear, then the Unicode editorial committee would undoubtedly like
>to hear about it.
There is no question that there are still things that are unclear and
things that are anachronistic in the definitions. I have been told that the
editorial *is* aware of these things and looking at them with the intent to
revise them for TUS 4.0.
- Peter
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peter Constable
Non-Roman Script Initiative, SIL International
7500 W. Camp Wisdom Rd., Dallas, TX 75236, USA
Tel: +1 972 708 7485
E-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
