In a message dated 2001-06-22 15:53:43 Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Y'all happy about Shavian being encoded? Has it been? I know the proposal has been out there for several years, but neither the Unicode site nor the WG2 site has any updated information to indicate it has been finally approved. I'd be interested in some newer information. -Doug Ewell Fullerton, California
- Re: Shavian (was: Re: UTF-17) DougEwell2
- Re: Shavian (was: Re: UTF-17) Michael Everson
- Re: Shavian (was: Re: UTF-17) Richard Cook
- Re: Shavian (was: Re: UTF-17) Michael Everson
- Re: Shavian (was: Re: UTF-17) Richard Cook
- Re: Shavian Michael Everson
- Re: Shavian (was: Re: UTF-17) Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
- Re: Shavian (was: Re: UTF-17) John H. Jenkins
- Re: Shavian (was: Re: UTF-17) Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
- Re: Shavian (was: Re: UTF-17) David Starner
- Re: Shavian (was: Re: UTF-17) John Cowan

