Re: status of Jindai scripts?

[Michael Everson]

At 13:33 -0700 2001-07-03, Edward Cherlin wrote:

>The conclusion seems to be that jindai moji are historical fakes 
>that passed into real, if limited, use. Realler than Klingon, 
>apparently. :-) So the question is, do any historians want to create 
>an electronic corpus for study, and do they need Unicode character 
>encoding to publish papers on it? Does anybody else want to use it?

Perhaps we ought to wait for the historians to ask us.
-- 
Michael Everson