Re: Is there Unicode mail out there?

[Mark Davis]

Take a look at the XML standard.

Mark
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Tex Texin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Mark Davis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Michael Everson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, July 14, 2001 21:15
Subject: Re: Is there Unicode mail out there?


> Mark, 
> Hi. I am not sure why you say this. &lt; is often used for "<"
> but &#X003C; works in both IE 5 and Netscape 4.7.
> 
> &#X0007; shows a box though...
> 
> But I was not aware of any restrictions on numeric character
> references. Is there a list of restrictions somewhere?
> tex
> 
> 
> Mark Davis wrote:
> > 
> > No, but it is for the vast majority.
> > 
> > Some have to be written specially, e.g. &lt;
> > 
> > Some cannot be written at all, e.g. U+0007 (but U+0087 can be!)
> > 
> > Mark
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Michael Everson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Saturday, July 14, 2001 05:10
> > Subject: Re: Is there Unicode mail out there?
> > 
> > > At 11:07 -0400 2001-07-13, Tex Texin wrote:
> > >
> > > >Maybe writing the value as an HTML numeric character reference (e.g.
> > > >&#X20AC;) would also make it easier for processes reading files
> > > >saved by the mailer
> > > >to recover the character.
> > >
> > > Perhaps I have been asleep, but is that notation (&#Xxxxx;) valid
> > > HTML for all Unicode characters?
> > > --
> > > Michael Everson
> 
> -- 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> Tex Texin                      Director, International Business
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]      +1-781-280-4271
> Fax:+1-781-280-4655
> the Progress Company           14 Oak Park, Bedford, MA 01730
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> 
>