> If ISCII is still being developed does this suggest that Unicode and its ISO
> equivalent move too slowly?
ISCII dates back to 1988 with a revision in 1990. It's not "still being
developed" -- as far as I know, it's a stable standard that is under
routine maintenance.
I wonder if anyone has yet corresponded with the people who put up the
almost unbelievable misconceptions on the two web pages mentioned
yesterday? At least a note could go to the site owners, I would think.
Rick
- discontent about Indic scripts and Unicode Hietaniemi Jarkko (NRC/Boston)
- Re: discontent about Indic scripts and... Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
- Re: discontent about Indic scripts and... Kenneth Whistler
- RE: discontent about Indic scripts and... Carl W. Brown
- Re: discontent about Indic scripts and... Ram Viswanadha
- RE: discontent about Indic scripts... Carl W. Brown
- RE: discontent about Indic scripts and... Carl W. Brown
- Re: discontent about Indic scripts... Charlie Jolly
- RE: discontent about Indic scripts... James E. Agenbroad
- Re: discontent about Indic scripts and... Rick McGowan
- Re: discontent about Indic scripts... James E. Agenbroad
- RE: discontent about Indic scripts and... Carl W. Brown
- Re: discontent about Indic scripts... Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
- Re: discontent about Indic scripts... Ram Viswanadha

