> If ISCII is still being developed does this suggest that Unicode and its ISO 
> equivalent move too slowly?

ISCII dates back to 1988 with a revision in 1990.  It's not "still being  
developed" -- as far as I know, it's a stable standard that is under  
routine maintenance.

I wonder if anyone has yet corresponded with the people who put up the  
almost unbelievable misconceptions on the two web pages mentioned  
yesterday?  At least a note could go to the site owners, I would think.

        Rick

Reply via email to