"If you think you have the answer to all the problems, then you
don't know all the problems."
I tried to make a point, and apparently made it poorly. I will try
again. It seems that some people are arguing that UTF-16 is the ideal
solution for all computing, and that UTF-8 and UTF-32 exist only for network
transport. Without getting bogged down in details, I care to disagree.
Analyze problem. Pick solution. In that order.
/|/|ike
- UTF-8 <> UCS-2/UTF-16 conversion for libra... Tom Emerson
- Re: UTF-8 <> UCS-2/UTF-16 conversion ... Kenneth Whistler
- Re: UTF-8 <> UCS-2/UTF-16 convers... Asmus Freytag
- RE: UTF-8 <> UCS-2/UTF-16 conversion ... Ayers, Mike
- Re: UTF-8 <> UCS-2/UTF-16 convers... Mark Davis
- RE: UTF-8 <> UCS-2/UTF-16 convers... Carl W. Brown
- RE: UTF-8 <> UCS-2/UTF-16 conversion ... Ayers, Mike
- RE: UTF-8 <> UCS-2/UTF-16 convers... Michael Everson
- Re: UTF-8 <> UCS-2/UTF-16 convers... Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
- RE: UTF-8 <> UCS-2/UTF-16 convers... Carl W. Brown
- Re: UTF-8 <> UCS-2/UTF-16 conversion ... DougEwell2

