It's an FAQ, explained over and over again. Yes, the original block of Hangul syllables was removed and a new block created at the insistence of Korea. This was only possible because nobody had implemented the original block. It can't happen again.
A lot of people were very unhappy about the whole matter. Many would prefer that Newbies read the Standard and the unicode.org Web site and not mention such things in public. :-) Edward Cherlin Generalist "A knot! Oh, do let me help to undo it." Alice in Wonderland > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On > Behalf Of Oodi Pilzer > Sent: Wed, September 19, 2001 11:04 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: More on differences between v1.1 and v2.0 > > > I found on the unicode.org website the character mapping > for v2.0 and that > for v1.1.5. > ...to my amazement, while version 2 added > characters in Hebrew > and Tibetan, it looked like it removed a whole bunch of > Hangul characters. > I had expected characters added but not removed...
