> Tengwar has vowel diacritics that seem to follow temporal order, so it > may be that it should be an abugida rather than an alphasyllabary, but > it is not an abjad. I am not too sure of the distinction between > abugida and alphasyllabary, to be honest. Help on this would be > welcome.
Here's something: http://www.geocities.com/TimesSquare/4948/tengwar/ | and Cirth would be Alphabet (like Runic). > Cirth is already described as an alphabet, so I am not sure what you > mean. Ooops, sorry, missed that.
