On Sat, 13 Oct 2001, Jungshik Shin wrote: > double consonant.) It's also featural at a lower level. The shape > of basic consonants - Giyeok [k/g], Nieun [n], Digeut [t/d], etc - were > devised to 'imitate' the shape of 'vocal organs' when they're pronounced .......... > consonants close in terms of pronunciation are similar to each other in > their shapes as well. This was recorded in Hun-min-jeong-um (a book
I was wrong about the reference. I was uncertain and I should have checked it. It's not Hun-min-jong-um but Hun-min-jong-um-hae-rye (Explanations and examples of the correct sound for the instruction of the people) where this explanation of the origin of the shape was given. The former was published under King Sejong's reign but the latter was published *a few decades after* the formal announcement of Hangul. This means this origin theory is very convincing but not as definitive as what I wrote before. Here's the excerpt from Ross King in Daniels and Bright: .....Despite numerous thories attempting to link it to, or derive it from, other scripts (there are no less than ten different "origin theories'), the most convinving theory of the letter shape origins remains that given in the Hwunmin cengum haylyey(HCH) 'Explanations and ...... people', which was lost and not rediscovered until 1940. According to the HCH, the basic consonant shape for each of the five places of articulation is based on a graphic representation of the speech organ involved. The vowel signs were organized on a completely different basis, and given a metaphysical rationale. Each vowel sign was made up of one or more of the three elements, Man, Eath, and Heaven. Jungshik Shin
