Arjun Aggarwal wrote: > >Moreover, the concept of <la = half la + danda> may be > natural for people > >who are used to typewriters and typography. Which is, some > of the people > >who are more likely to switch to computers. > > I fully agree with Mr. Marco Cimarosti in this regard. > > This is the point to which i really wanted everybody to focus > on i.e. the problem of encoding as well as display .
Therefore, you don't fully agree with me. My opinion is that the encoding is OK as it is in ISCII and Unicode. I take in consideration "your" way of splitting the graphemes *only* at the editing level. _ Marco
