On Sat, 22 Dec 2001, Thomas Chan wrote: > On Sat, 22 Dec 2001, Michael (michka) Kaplan wrote:
> > > Robert (11 digit boy) said: > > > font is used to display Japanese or such. I think that > > > there is a certain 5-stroke character that will answer it. > > > It is U+5E73. > > > > Well, there is a difference here: > > > > Japanese/CHS version: ( \ / ) > > Korean/CHT version: (/ \) > > Although I suppose this could be font differences, too? "Pseudo Verified" > > on a WinXP system with the following fonts: > Yes, there are simply font differences. The latter form, with the > diagonal strokes arranged like / \, is the more canonical form, typically > seen in printing when using the kinds of fonts that you tested with. > However, the former form, with the diagonal strokes positioned like \ /, > is more of a handwritten form, although you may see it in fonts that more I totally agree with you. When I saw the first glyph (with \ /) in Michael's message before going down to the second(with / \), I wondered what Korean form is if that glyph is not because that's exactly the way I and most other Koreans 'draw' that character. Jungshik Shin
