|
----- Original
Message -----
From: "David Starner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Aman Chawla" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "James Kass" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Unicode" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 12:19 AM Subject: Re: Devanagari > What's your point in continuing this? Most of the people on this list > already know how UTF-8 can expand the size of non-English text. The issue was originally brought up to gather opinion from members of this list as to whether UTF-8 or ISCII should be used for creating Devanagari web pages. The point is not to criticise Unicode but to gather opinions of informed persons (list members) and determine what is the best encoding for information interchange in South-Asian scripts... |
- Re: Devanagari Aman Chawla
- Re: Devanagari Barry Caplan
- Re: Devanagari James Kass
- Re: Devanagari Aman Chawla
- Re: Devanagari Michael Everson
- Re: Devanagari Guntupalli Karunakar
- RE: Devanagari Christopher J Fynn
- Re: Devanagari David Starner
- Re: Devanagari Michael Everson
- Re: Devanagari Geoffrey Waigh
- Re: Devanagari Aman Chawla
- Re: Devanagari David Starner
- Re: Devanagari Mark Davis \(jtcsv\)
- Re: Devanagari Michael Everson
- Re: Devanagari James Kass
- Re: Devanagari DougEwell2
- Re: Devanagari David Starner
- Re: Devanagari Lars Marius Garshol
- Re: Devanagari DougEwell2
- RE: Devanagari Marco Cimarosti
- Re: Devanagari David Starner

