-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Rick McGowan wrote: > You must be talking about the small number of glyphs that don't exist in > the Mathematical Variants table.
Yes. > There are several known missing glyphs that should have been noted in the > cover file for the entire release. The known non-existing glyphs are in > column two: 2229, 222A, 2278, 2279, 2293, 2294; and in column one: 2A3C > through 2ACC, eight glyphs all together. The column-two glyphs never > existed in the original proposal; and the column 1 glyphs are missing from > the set of reference glyphs for Unicode 3.2. We can *guess* what the column two glyphs look like from the descriptions, I suppose, but isn't it kind of important to have images of them? - -- David Hopwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Home page & PGP public key: http://www.users.zetnet.co.uk/hopwood/ RSA 2048-bit; fingerprint 71 8E A6 23 0E D3 4C E5 0F 69 8C D4 FA 66 15 01 Nothing in this message is intended to be legally binding. If I revoke a public key but refuse to specify why, it is because the private key has been seized under the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act; see www.fipr.org/rip -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.3i Charset: noconv iQEVAwUBPE45fDkCAxeYt5gVAQG1VQgAlxpiB+nE7RH0nGwILkV15kt/pX8VwIYA WDdJbfjKSERTV9vPIsVfFLLJQVx4nZlZgno0xfx29iQhrdV1dQ57R6jYjOCXsJ32 AKaz5nRF8QU98i1socEc2eG1SR53KpFQkNn3phd76yJ4mam7EqEwEPQihkh7SCQX cgLrSt2eVqI0NPN/ossCQTa6j9aQHjy/k0SIbOjNH+7aW9B+23UlCv8fYcu2LvC4 vBbteyp3tZbgPN9DqMCMr+GMbgOSIbzWuF336SRGiIGlaM1J1259iFysmyY+EjSS +mLT0H1HhIUFD/u0tSIXjJgE01vQPFCdTcxVbM8IaXFqevQVz4zKDQ== =edaO -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
