Hi, Michael By 'we', do you mean Microsoft? If so, I'm surprised you identify yourself so closely with that corporation - I thought you were an independent contractor...
As for the question of whether Microsoft has robbed anyone, I would say that there are a couple of cases before the courts that bear on that very question - and that Microsoft hasn't been faring very well in establishing its innocence! ;^) Thanks - rick cameron -----Original Message----- From: Michael (michka) Kaplan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, 24 January 2002 11:06 To: Marco Cimarosti; Dinesh Agarwal; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [OT] Rich man Bill (RE: Issues with Unicode Hindi) Importance: Low We rob NO ONE. We behave with honor and we wish others to do the same with us. Its a respect thing. MichKa Michael Kaplan Trigeminal Software, Inc. -- http://www.trigeminal.com/ ----- Original Message ----- From: "Marco Cimarosti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Michael (michka) Kaplan'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Dinesh Agarwal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 10:44 AM Subject: [OT] Rich man Bill (RE: Issues with Unicode Hindi) > > [...] but do we rob the rich man because he is rich? > > (I hope everyone thinks the answer here is no!). > > I have been told that this mailing list is not for politics, so let's stick > to bare logics: > > 1. "we rob the poor man because he is poor" > 2. "we rob the poor man because he is rich" > 3. "we rob the rich man because he is poor" > 4. "we rob the rich man because he is rich" > > Do you agree that 2 and 3 are self-contradictory? So the choice is > between 1 > and 4... > > _ Marco > >
