>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: Variation Selection
>Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2002 22:29:02 EST
>
>In a message dated 2002-01-27 18:51:35 Pacific Standard Time,
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> > First, have we all servers?
>
>No.  Assuming we all do is no better than assuming we all have broadband 
or
>T1 connections.
>
> > Second, if it is a small attachment, the number of bytes transmitted to 
GO
> > there may well be greater than the number to send the bloody thing. How
> > about an arbitrary attachment limit of 1535 
>($B%JDE%'%RW$%D:d(B�$B!#c`TE%ec`TD%1%D!'c`(B
$BTE@d(B�$BTE^d(B�$BTEZd(B�$BTD%"(B)
>bytes?
>
>I just sent a 500-byte attachment to the Unicode list without any qualms.
>Almost all messages are longer than 500 bytes, especially when you take
>headers into account.  However, there is certainly such a thing as "too
>long," and I have no idea where to draw the line and say "this attachment 
is
>short enough, that one is too long."
>
>-Doug Ewell
>  Fullerton, California

I just said 1535 because I like the word "himemiko". Also, it is just under 
1 1/2 KB, and that attachment size is good for small black-and-white 
illustrations (for character placement, etc.) Some Swedish (?) person came 
up with an excellent use for some illustrations about a month ago, when 
discussing a Swedish ampersand and a few other characters on this list.

Also, Sarasvati's birth year should be an agreeable number for her to use 
as a file size limit. And since I never give a lady's age, remember, it is 
not necessarily a Gregorian year!




$B!!!!"*!!$8$e$&$$$C$A$c$s!!"+(B
$B!!!!!!$@$s$;$$$i$7$5$`$h$&(B


_________________________________________________________________
$B%a!<%k%5!<%S%9$O!"@$3&(B No.1 $B$N(B MSN Hotmail 
$B$G!*(Bhttp://www.hotmail.com/JA/

Reply via email to