At 12:33 -0800 2002-02-03, Mark Davis wrote: >This has bitten more than a few people. For political reasons, having >to do with the synchronization of names to ISO 10646, the name fields >are empty for the control characters. That is because (at least in >theory) people could have other semantics for those characters.
I would really favour challenging WG2 to accept reality and reference the glyphs and names at least informatively in 10646. I'd support it in committee. -- Michael Everson *** Everson Typography *** http://www.evertype.com
