|
Hello,
Before you call this thread a waste of time, and out of curiosity.. what
were the considerations put forth which determined the way the
bidi
algorithm is (uax#9). Ie. what were the pros and cons of a reversible
bidi?
Also, who make up the 'bidi community'? The users or the developer(s)
of the bidi algorithm?
Thank you
--
Mohammed Elzubeir
>>> "Mark Davis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 02/04/02 10:13AM >>> > >Outlook Express, at least the version you are using, has a bug; The BIDI algorithm is not reversible, and could not be made reversible without eliminating features that are important to the bidi community. This was considered at the time the bidi algorithm was developed. This thread is a waste of time. Mark |
- Re: Unicode and ... David Starner
- Re: Unicode and ... John H. Jenkins
- Re: Unicode and ... John Hudson
- RE: Unicode and ... Christopher J Fynn
- Re: Unicode and ... Michael Everson
- Re: Unicode and ... Otto Stolz
- RE: Unicode and ... Jonathan Rosenne
- Re: Unicode and ... Rick McGowan
- Re: Unicode and Security Rick McGowan
- Re: Unicode and Security Bob_Hallissy
- Re: Unicode and Security Moe Elzubeir
- Re: Unicode and Security Mark Davis
- Re: Unicode and Security ろ〇〇〇〇 ろ〇〇〇
- Re: Unicode and Security Kenneth Whistler
- RE: Unicode and Security Lars Kristan
- Re: Unicode and Security John H. Jenkins
- Re: Unicode and Security Elliotte Rusty Harold
- Re: Unicode and Security Lars Marius Garshol
- Re: Unicode and Security Elliotte Rusty Harold
- Re: Unicode and Security Barry Caplan
- Re: Unicode and Secu... Asmus Freytag

