From: "Michael Everson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > At 14:16 -0600 2002-02-14, David Starner wrote:
> There is no reason to use ISO 10646, besides pedanticness. > It is ISO/IEC 10646. The defense rests. MichKa Michael Kaplan Trigeminal Software, Inc. -- http://www.trigeminal.com/
