On 03/08/2002 05:09:46 AM Michael Everson wrote: >At 15:36 -0600 07/03/2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >>I may be wrong, but I believe that example has < ra, halant, ra, >>independent i >. The first ra is the one that transforms into the reph. > >You're wrong. RI in this case is a way of writing the vocalic r. >Compare Kr.s.n.a and Krishna.
I guess that's what I get for comment on things beyond my ken. Mea culpa. - Peter --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Peter Constable Non-Roman Script Initiative, SIL International 7500 W. Camp Wisdom Rd., Dallas, TX 75236, USA Tel: +1 972 708 7485 E-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
