On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 07:06:12AM -0800, Michael (michka) Kaplan wrote: > I > think it is entirely reasonable to look at rarely used scripts and fictional > scripts (both of which member companies are unlikely to implement for > reasons I doubt I need to go into here?) and categorize them a lower > priority than that of scripts that are neither?
Sure. That's been done, and now almost everything not rarely-used or fictional has been encoded. > When specifically choosing between a rarely used script and a fictional > script, the former is more appealing to me personally as I feel that there > is a greater value to dealing with what is "real" first. I feel there's a greater value to encoding a large body of poetry and writing in a script in current use, rather than 50 pages (the entire corpus of Gothic writing) that's always printed in Latin transliteration. -- David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED] "It's not a habit; it's cool; I feel alive. If you don't have it you're on the other side." - K's Choice (probably refering to the Internet)
