Those are good...except for > Or: "One font can handle all of Unicode"
should be: "I need a single font with all Unicode characters so that I can handle all of Unicode" Mark ----- Original Message ----- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 20:13 Subject: Re: More Unicode Myths? > > > > Dear Mark, > > >I am going to be updating my slides on "Unicode Myths" for a presentation > in April. If anyone has any additional myths (common misinformation about > Unicode), I'd appreciate suggestions. > > How about: Unicode messed up the encoding of <insert favourite, probably > indic, script here> because I don't see how to implement it with current > technology. > Or: "I don't need to know what language of the text I am processing is. One > algorithm fits all" > > Or: "One font can handle all of Unicode" > > Or: "The Unicode Consortium is a monolithic top down organisation that > doesn't need my help/input" > > I don't know how many of these are common and are worth including. > > Martin Hosken > >
