On Sunday, March 24, 2002, at 03:28 , Autrijus Tang wrote: > Nothing fancy, just spell-checked and pod-checked the documents. > > Also, shouldn't EncodeFormat.pod be renamed to Encode/Format.pod for > consistency's sake?
I was about to do the rename and thanks for the patch. but the patch for Encode.pm fails at Hunk #6. I even tried a fresh copy of Encode-0.97 and Encode-0.96 and still get the same result. Would you please send me a whole file, Encode.pm to make sure? URI is the most welcome but mime attachment is okay. Dan the Encode Maitainer > > patch < ../Encode/autrijius.patch > Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... > The text leading up to this was: > -------------------------- > |diff -durN lib.old/Encode/Details.pod lib/Encode/Details.pod > |--- lib.old/Encode/Details.pod Sun Mar 24 13:22:06 2002 > |+++ lib/Encode/Details.pod Sun Mar 24 13:43:14 2002 > -------------------------- > Patching file lib/Encode/Details.pod using Plan A... > Hunk #1 succeeded at 1. > Hunk #2 succeeded at 14. > Hunk #3 succeeded at 87. > Hunk #4 succeeded at 260. > Hunk #5 succeeded at 407. > Hunk #6 succeeded at 496 with fuzz 1. > Hunk #7 succeeded at 613. > Hunk #8 succeeded at 627. > Hunk #9 succeeded at 803. > Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... > The text leading up to this was: > -------------------------- > |diff -durN lib.old/Encode/Supported.pod lib/Encode/Supported.pod > |--- lib.old/Encode/Supported.pod Sun Mar 24 13:22:06 2002 > |+++ lib/Encode/Supported.pod Sun Mar 24 13:29:35 2002 > -------------------------- > Patching file lib/Encode/Supported.pod using Plan A... > Hunk #1 succeeded at 24. > Hunk #2 succeeded at 102. > Hunk #3 succeeded at 173. > Hunk #4 succeeded at 209. > Hunk #5 succeeded at 235. > Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... > The text leading up to this was: > -------------------------- > |--- Encode.pm.bak Sun Mar 24 04:24:42 2002 > |+++ Encode.pm Sun Mar 24 13:43:47 2002 > -------------------------- > Patching file Encode.pm using Plan A... > Hunk #1 succeeded at 234. > Hunk #2 succeeded at 242. > Hunk #3 succeeded at 252. > Hunk #4 succeeded at 262. > Hunk #5 failed at 336. > Hunk #6 succeeded at 381. > Hunk #7 succeeded at 401. > Hunk #8 succeeded at 481. > Hunk #9 succeeded at 495 with fuzz 2. > 1 out of 9 hunks failed--saving rejects to Encode.pm.rej > done
