>This is a barrier erected for three reasons: > > 1. If a proposed character can't pass the font test -- i.e., nobody can > come up with a usable font that contains it -- then it may be of > rather marginal usefulness, since apparently people *aren't* using it. > Of course, historical materials printed with lead type or other > technologies may be exceptions, if no one has gotten around to > constructing modern computer fonts for it yet. >
Hmmm... Printed??? Ogham and Gothic come to mind. Why does the printed word get so much more respect than the written word? It would be like saying that for a spoken language to be accepted into a registry, one must make a speech synthesizer for the language. Are not handwritten glyphs just as valid as printed / typed / computer generated ones? 十一ちゃん 真の愛は無理な事だかしら _________________________________________________________________ メールだけじゃなかった！インターネット便利サービスがひとまとまり http://explorer.msn.co.jp/
