I reversed miswrote as BE; sorry for the confusion. Mark ----- Original Message ----- From: "Doug Ewell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Mark Davis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2002 18:13 Subject: [private] Re: Default endianness of Unicode, or not
> > If UTF-16 (serialized) without a BOM, could be in either order, then > > the interpretation would be indeterminate. If you want to output > > <0x34 0x12 0x61 0x00 0x00 0xD8 0x00 0xDC> then tag it as UTF-16BE, > > not just UTF-16. > > I assume you mean "tag it as UTF-16LE." > > -Doug ----- Original Message ----- From: "Markus Scherer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Mark Davis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 09:52 Subject: Re: Default endianness of Unicode, or not > Mark Davis wrote: > > > If UTF-16 (serialized) without a BOM, could be in either order, then > > the interpretation would be indeterminate. If you want to output <0x34 > > 0x12 0x61 0x00 0x00 0xD8 0x00 0xDC> then tag it as UTF-16BE, not just > > UTF-16. > > > The second email in this thread where you _mean_ UTF-16LE but you _write_ UTF-16BE... > markus
