>Yes, I feel that it is worth putting forward a proposal for the open and >closed padlock symbols...
>So, a suggestion, how about the following four symbols. I have added some >Private Use Area allocation suggestions... Readers who read my suggestions >regarding the Private Use Area may perhaps observe that these present >suggestions are within the range U+F300 through to U+F3FF Either we are going to propose these be added to Unicode as non-PUA characters, or we are not. If not, there is nothing more that needs discussion with regard to possible codepoint allocation, I think. As for PUA, many people have their own plans regarding U+F300..U+F3FF. For my own part, my plans for U+F300..U+F3FF almost certainly do not involve padlock symbols. - Peter --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Peter Constable Non-Roman Script Initiative, SIL International 7500 W. Camp Wisdom Rd., Dallas, TX 75236, USA Tel: +1 972 708 7485 E-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
