On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 03:54:00PM -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote: > On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 03:43:30PM +0200, Keld J?rn Simonsen wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 08:03:05AM -0400, Thomas E. Dickey wrote: > > > On Thu, 27 Jun 2002, Keld J�rn Simonsen wrote: > > > > > > > What people usually use is ISO 6429, this is eg what is used in > > > > IETF charset definitions for the iso-8859 series. > > > > > > 6249 isn't the character-set definition - it's the control-sequences. > > > 8859 corresponds to character-set definitions. > > > > > > (I assume that's what you meant to say, but did not). > > > > 6429 defines both control sequences and control characters. > > only incidentally - the focus of the document (the other 98% by page count) > is devoted to control sequences.
Agreeg, but we are looking for the source for control characters, and then 6429 is the one altho it is not the meat of that standard. > my point: a more accurate answer to his question would have been to point out > 2022. Which only specifies very few control characters? Nah, 6429 is the answer, if these codes are used at all, and 10646 also refers 6429. Kind regards keld
