On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, Doug Ewell wrote:

> Not at all.  Ciphers are out-of-scope for ConScript by definition.  But
> *somebody* might want to create a PUA encoding for them (e.g. so they
> can be intermixed with unenciphered Latin script, as the Disney-script
> sites do).

I can't see why they can't use a different font. Are these things
characters? I believe they are only glyph variants.

BTW, this will have a single problem: people will be able to decipher it
by cut and paste!

roozbeh


Reply via email to